# 15.2: Gust Fronts and Downbursts

- Page ID
- 9625

# 15.2.1. Attributes

**Downbursts** are rapidly descending (w = –5 to –25 m s^{–1}) downdrafts of air (Fig. 15.11), found below clouds with precipitation or virga. Downbursts of 0.5 to 10 km diameter are usually associated with thunderstorms and heavy rain. Downburst speeds of order 10 m s^{–1} have been measured 100 m AGL. The descending air can hit the ground and spread out as strong **straight-line winds** causing damage equivalent to a weak tornado (up to EF3 intensity). Smaller mid-level clouds (e.g., altocumulus with virga) can also produce downbursts that usually do not reach the ground.

Small diameter (1 to 4 km) downbursts that last only 2 to 5 min are called **microbursts**. Sometimes a downburst area will include one or more embedded microbursts.

Acceleration of downburst velocity w is found by applying Newton’s 2nd law of motion to an air parcel:

\(\ \begin{align} \frac{\Delta w}{\Delta t} \approx-\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{\Delta P^{\prime}}{\Delta z}+|g| \cdot\left[\frac{\theta_{v}^{\prime}}{\theta_{v e}}-\frac{C_{v}}{C_{p}} \frac{P^{\prime}}{P_{e}}\right]\tag{15.5}\end{align}\)

\(\ Term: (A) \quad\quad\quad (B)\quad\quad\quad (C)\)

where w is negative for downdrafts, t is time, ρ is air density, P’ = P_{parcel} – P_{e }is pressure perturbation of the air parcel relative to the environmental pressure P_{e}, z is height, |g| = 9.8 m s^{–2} is the magnitude of gravitational acceleration, θ_{v}’ = θ_{v parcel} – θ_{ve} is the deviation of the parcel’s virtual potential temperature from that of the environment θ_{ve} (in Kelvin), and C_{v}/C_{p} = 0.714 is the ratio of specific heat of air at constant volume to that at constant pressure.

Remember that the virtual potential temperature (from the Heat chapter) includes liquid-water and ice loading, which makes the air act as if it were colder, denser, and heavier. Namely, for the air parcel it is:

\(\ \begin{align} \theta_{v \text { parcel }}=\theta_{\text {parcel}} \cdot\left(1+0.61 \cdot r-r_{L}-r_{I}\right)_{\text {parcel}}\tag{15.6}\end{align}\)

where θ is air potential temperature (in Kelvin), r is water-vapor mixing ratio (in g g^{–1}, not g kg^{–1}), r_{L} is liquid water mixing ratio (in g g^{–1}), and rI is ice mixing ratio (in g g^{–1}). For the special case of an environment with no liquid water or ice, the environmental virtual potential temperature is:

\(\ \begin{align} \theta_{v e}=\theta_{e} \cdot(1+0.61 \cdot r)_{e}\tag{15.7}\end{align}\)

Equation (15.5) says that three forces (per unit mass) can create or enhance downdrafts. (A) Pressure-gradient force is caused when there is a difference between the pressure profile in the environment (which is usually hydrostatic) and that of the parcel. (B) Buoyant force combines the effects of temperature in the evaporatively cooled air, precipitation drag associated with falling rain drops or ice crystals, and the relatively lower density of water vapor. (C) Perturbation-pressure buoyancy force is where an air parcel of lower pressure than its surroundings experiences an upward force. Although this last effect is believed to be small, not much is really known about it, so we will neglect it here.

Evaporative cooling and precipitation drag are important for initially accelerating the air downward out of the cloud. We will discuss those factors first, because they can create downbursts. The vertical pressure gradient becomes important only near the ground. It is responsible for decelerating the downburst just before it hits the ground, which we will discuss in the “gust front” subsection.

# 15.2.2. Precipitation Drag on the Air

When **hydrometeors** (rain drops and ice crystals) fall at their terminal velocity through air, the drag between the hydrometeor and the air tends to pull some of the air with the falling precipitation. This **precipitation drag** produces a downward force on the air equal to the weight of the precipitation particles. For details on precipitation drag, see the Precipitation Processes Chapter.

This effect is also called** liquid-water loading** or **ice loading**, depending on the phase of the hydrometeor. The downward force due to precipitation loading makes the air parcel act heavier, having the same effect as denser, colder air. As was discussed in the Atmos. Basics and Heat Budgets chapters, use virtual temperature T_{v} or virtual potential temperature θ_{v} to quantify this effective cooling.

**Sample Application**

10 g kg^{–1} of liquid water exists as rain drops in saturated air of temperature 10°C and pressure 80 kPa. The environmental air has a temperature of 10°C and mixing ratio of 4 g kg^{–1}. Find the: (a) buoyancy force per mass associated with air temperature and water vapor, (b) buoyancy force per mass associated with just the precipitation drag, and (c) the downdraft velocity after 1 minute of fall, due to only (a) and (b).

**Find the Answer**

Given: Parcel: r_{L} = 10 g kg^{–1}, T = 10°C, P = 80 kPa, Environ.: r = 4 g kg^{–1}, T = 10°C, P = 80 kPa, ∆t = 60 s. Neglect terms (A) and (C).

Find: (a) Term(Bdue to T & r) = ? N kg^{–1},

(b) Term(Bdue to r_{L} & r_{I} ) = ? N kg^{–1} (c) w = ? m s^{–1}

(a) Because the parcel air is saturated, r_{parcel} = r_{s}. Using a thermo diagram (because its faster than solving a bunch of equations), r_{s} ≈ 9.5 g kg^{–1} at P = 80 kPa and T = 10°C. Also, from the thermo diagram, θ_{parcel} ≈ 28°C = 301 K. Thus, using the first part of eq. (15.6):

θ_{v parcel} ≈ (301 K)·[1 + 0.61·(0.0095 g g^{–1})] ≈ 302.7 K

For the environment, also θ ≈ 28°C = 301 K, but r = 4 g kg^{–1}. Thus, using eq. (15.7):

θ_{ve} ≈ (301 K)·[1 + 0.61·(0.004 g g^{–1})] ≈ 301.7 K

Use eq. (15.5): Term(B_{due to T & r}) = |g|·[ ( θ_{v parcel} – θ_{ve} ) / θ_{ve} ] = (9.8 m s^{–2})·[ (302.7 – 301.7 K) / 301.7 K ] = 0.032 m s^{–2} =** 0.032 N kg ^{–1}**.

(b) Because r_{I} was not given, assume r_{I} = 0 everywhere, and r_{L} = 0 in the environment.

Term(B_{due to rL & rI} ) = –|g|·[ (r_{L} + r_{I} )_{parcel} – (r_{L} + r_{I} )_{e}]. = – (9.8 m s^{–2})·[ 0.01 g g^{–1} ] = **–0.098 N kg ^{–1}**.

(c) Assume initial vertical velocity is zero.

Use eq. (15.5) with only Term B: ( w_{final} – w_{initial} )/ ∆t = [Term(B_{T} &_{ r}) + Term(B_{rL} & r_{I} )]

w_{final} = (60 s)·[ 0.032 – 0.098 m s^{–2} ] ≈ **–4 m s ^{–1}**.

**Check:** Units OK. Physics OK.

**Exposition:** Although the water vapor in the air adds buoyancy equivalent to a temperature increase of 1°C, the liquid-water loading decreases buoyancy, equivalent to a temperature decrease of 3°C. The net effect is that this saturated, liquid-water laden air acts 2°C colder and heavier than dry air at the same T.

CAUTION. The final vertical velocity assumes that the air parcel experiences constant buoyancy forces during its 1 minute of fall. This is NOT a realistic assumption, but it did make the exercise a bit easier to solve. In fact, if the rain-laden air descends below cloud base, then it is likely that the rain drops are in an __ un__saturated air parcel, not saturated air as was stated for this exercise. We also neglected turbulent drag of the downburst air against the environmental air. This effect can greatly reduce the actual downburst speed compared to the idealized calculations above.

# 15.2.3. Cooling due to Droplet Evaporation

Three factors can cause the rain-filled air to be unsaturated. (1) The rain can fall out of the thunderstorm into drier air (namely, the rain moves __through__ the air parcels, not __with__ the air parcels). (2) As air parcels descend in the downdraft (being dragged downward by the rain), the air parcels warm adiabatically and can hold more vapor. (3) Mixing of the rainy air with the surrounding drier environment can result in a mixture with lowered humidity.

Raindrops can partially or totally evaporate in this unsaturated air, converting sensible heat into latent heat. Namely, air cools as the water evaporates, and cool air has negative buoyancy. Negatively buoyant air sinks, creating downbursts of air. One way to quantify the cooling is via the change of potential temperature associated with evaporation of ∆rL (g_{liq.water} kg_{air}^{–1}) of liquid water:

\(\ \begin{align} \Delta \theta_{\text {parcel}}=\left(L_{v} / C_{p}\right) \cdot \Delta r_{L}\tag{15.8}\end{align}\)

where (L_{v}/C_{p}) = 2.5 K·kg^{air}·(g_{water})^{–1}, and where ∆r_{L} = r_{L} _{final} – r_{L initial} is negative for evaporation. This parcel cooling enters the downdraft-velocity equation via θ_{parcel} in eq. (15.6).

Precipitation drag is usually a smaller effect than evaporative cooling. Fig. 15.12 shows both the precipitation-drag effect for different initial liquidwater mixing ratios (the black dots), and the corresponding cooling and liquid-water decrease as the drops evaporate. For example, consider the black dot corresponding to an initial liquid water loading of 10 g kg^{–1}. Even before that drop evaporates, the weight of the rain decreases the virtual potential temperature by about 2.9°C. However, as that drop evaporates, it causes a much larger amount of cooling to due latent heat absorption, causing the virtual-potential-temperature to decrease by 25°C after it has completely evaporated.

Evaporative cooling can be large in places where the environmental air is dry, such as in the high-altitude plains and prairies of the USA and Canada. There, raining convective clouds can create strong downbursts, even if all the precipitation evaporates before reaching the ground (i.e., for **virga**).

Downbursts are hazardous to aircraft in two ways. (1) The downburst speed can be faster than the climb rate of the aircraft, pushing the aircraft towards the ground. (2) When the downburst hits the ground and spreads out, it can create hazardous changes between headwinds and tailwinds for landing and departing aircraft (see the “Aircraft vs. Downbursts” INFO Box in this section.) Modern airports are equipped with Doppler radar and/or wind-sensor arrays on the airport grounds, so that warnings can be given to pilots.

**Sample Application**

For data from the previous Sample Application, find the virtual potential temperature of the air if:

a) all liquid water evaporates, and

b) no liquid water evaporates, leaving only the precipitation-loading effect.

c) Discuss the difference between (a) and (b)

**Find the Answer**

Given: r_{L }= 10 g kg^{–1} initially. r_{L} = 0 finally.

Find: (a) ∆θ_{parcel} = ? K (b) ∆θ_{v parcel} = ? K

(a) Use eq. (15.8): ∆θ_{parcel} = [2.5 K·kg_{air}·(g_{water})^{–1}] · (–10 g kg^{–1}) = **–25 K**

(b) From the Exposition section of the previous Sample Application:

∆θ_{v parcel precip. drag} = –3 K initially

Thus, the __change__ of virtual potential temperature (between before and after the drop evaporates) is

∆θ_{v parcel} = ∆θ_{v parcel final} – ∆θ_{v parcel initial }

= – 25K – (–3 K) = **–22 K**.

**Check:** Units OK. Physics OK.

**Exposition:** (c) The rain is more valuable to the downburst if it all evaporates.

# 15.2.4. Downdraft CAPE (DCAPE)

Eq. (15.5) applies at any one altitude. As precipitation-laden air parcels descend, many things change. The descending air parcel cools and loses some of its liquid-water loading due to evaporation, thereby changing its virtual potential temperature. It descends into surroundings having different virtual potential temperature than the environment where it started. As a result of these changes to both the air parcel and its environment, the θ_{v}’ term in eq. (15.5) changes.

To account for all these changes, find term B from eq. (15.5) at each depth, and then sum over all depths to get the accumulated effect of evaporative cooling and precipitation drag. This is a difficult calculation, with many uncertainties.

An alternative estimate of downburst strength is via the **Downdraft Convective Available Potential Energy** (**DCAPE**, see shaded area in Fig. 15.13):

\(\ \begin{align} D C A P E=\sum_{z=0}^{z_{I F S}}|g| \frac{\theta_{v p}-\theta_{v e}}{\theta_{v e}} \cdot \Delta z\tag{15.9}\end{align}\)

where |g| = 9.8 m s^{–2} is the magnitude of gravitational acceleration, θ_{vp} is the parcel virtual potential temperature (including temperature, water vapor, and precipitation-drag effects), θ_{ve} is the environment virtual potential temperature (Kelvin in the denominator), ∆z is a height increment to be used when conceptually covering the DCAPE area with tiles of equal size.

The altitude z_{LFS} where the precipitation-laden air first becomes negatively buoyant compared to the environment is called the **level of free sink** (**LFS**), and is the downdraft equivalent of the level of free convection. If the downburst stays negatively buoyant to the ground, then the bottom limit of the sum is at z = 0, otherwise the downburst would stop at a **downdraft equilibrium level** (**DEL**) and not be felt at the ground. DCAPE is negative, and has units of J kg^{–1} or m^{2} s^{–2}.

By relating potential energy to kinetic energy, the downdraft velocity is approximately:

\(\ \begin{align} w_{\max d o w n}=-(2 \cdot|D C A P E|)^{1 / 2}\tag{15.10}\end{align}\)

Air drag of the descending air parcel against its surrounding environmental air could reduce the likely downburst velocity w_{d} to about half this max value (Fig. 15.14):

\(\ \begin{align} w_{d}=w_{\max\ d o w n} / 2\tag{15.11}\end{align}\)

Stronger downdrafts and associated straight-line winds near the ground are associated with larger magnitudes of DCAPE. For example, Fig. 15.15 shows a case study of DCAPE magnitudes valid at 22 UTC on 24 May 2006.

**Sample Application**

For the shaded area in Fig. 15.13, use the tiling method to estimate the value of DCAPE. Also find the maximum downburst speed and the likely speed.

**Find the Answer**

Given: Fig. 15.13, reproduced here.

Find: DCAPE = ? m^{2} s^{–2}, wmax down = ? m s^{–1} w_{d} = ? m s^{–1}

The DCAPE equation (15.9) can be re-written as

DCAPE = –[|g|/θ_{ve}]·(shaded area)

Method: Overlay the shaded region with tiles:

Each tile is 2°C = 2 K wide by 0.5 km tall (but you could pick other tile sizes instead). Hence, each tile is worth 1000 K·m. I count approximately 32 tiles needed to cover the shaded region. Thus:

(shaded area) = 32 x 1000 K·m = 32,000 K·m.

Looking at the plotted environmental sounding by eye, I estimate the average θ_{ve} = 37°C = 310 K.

DCAPE = –[(9.8 m s^{–2})/310K]·(32,000 K·m) = **–1012 m ^{2} s^{–2}**

Next, use eq. (15.10):

w_{max down} = –[ 2 ·|–1012 m^{2} s^{–2} |]^{1/2} = **–45 m s ^{–1}**

Finally, use eq. (15.11):

w_{d} = w_{max down}/2 = **–22.5 m s ^{–1}**.

**Check:** Units OK. Physics OK. Drawing OK.

**Exposition:** While this downburst speed might be observed 1 km above ground, the speed would diminish closer to the ground due to an opposing pressure-perturbation gradient. Since the DCAPE method doesn’t account for the vertical pressure gradient, it shouldn’t be used below about 1 km altitude.

Although DCAPE shares the same conceptual framework as CAPE, there is virtually no chance of practically utilizing DCAPE, whereas CAPE is very useful. Compare the two concepts.

__For CAPE:__ The initial state of the rising air parcel is known or fairly easy to estimate from surface observations and forecasts. The changing thermodynamic state of the parcel is easy to anticipate; namely, the parcel rises dry adiabatically to its LCL, and rises moist adiabatically above the LCL with vapor always close to its saturation value. Any excess water vapor instantly condenses to keep the air parcel near saturation. The resulting liquid cloud droplets are initially carried with the parcel.

__For DCAPE:__ Both the initial air temperature of the descending air parcel near thunderstorm base and the liquid-water mixing ratio of raindrops are unknown. The raindrops don’t move with the air parcel, but pass through the air parcel from above. The air parcel below cloud base is often NOT saturated even though there are raindrops within it. The temperature of the falling raindrops is often different than the temperature of the air parcel it falls through. There is no requirement that the adiabatic warming of the air due to descent into higher pressure be partially matched by evaporation from the rain drops (namely, the thermodynamic state of the descending air parcel can be neither dry adiabatic nor moist adiabatic).

Unfortunately, the exact thermodynamic path traveled by the descending rain-filled air parcel is unknown, as discussed in the INFO box. Fig. 15.13 illustrates some of the uncertainty in DCAPE. If the rain-filled air parcel starting at pressure altitude of 50 kPa experiences no evaporation, but maintains constant precipitation drag along with dry adiabatic warming, then the parcel state follows the thin solid arrow until it reaches its DEL at about 70 kPa. This would not reach the ground as a down burst.

If a descending saturated air parcel experiences just enough evaporation to balance adiabatic warming, then the temperature follows a moist adiabat, as shown with the thin dashed line. But it could be just as likely that the air parcel follows a thermodynamic path in between dry and moist adiabat, such as the arbitrary dotted line in that figure, which hits the ground as a cool but unsaturated downburst.

# 15.2.5. Pressure Perturbation

As the downburst approaches the ground, its vertical velocity must decelerate to zero because it cannot blow through the ground. This causes the dynamic pressure to increase (P’ becomes positive) as the air stagnates.

Rewriting Bernoulli’s equation (see the Regional Winds chapter) using the notation from eq. (15.5), the maximum stagnation pressure perturbation P’ max at the ground directly below the center of the downburst is:

\(\ \begin{align} P_{\max }^{\prime}=\rho \cdot\left[\frac{w_{d}^{2}}{2}-\frac{|g| \cdot \theta_{v}^{\prime} \cdot z}{\theta_{v e}}\right]\tag{15.12}\end{align}\)

\(\ Term:\quad \quad(A)\quad\quad(B)\)

where ρ is air density, w_{d} is likely peak downburst speed at height z well above the ground (before it feels the influence of the ground), |g| = 9.8 m s^{–2} is gravitational acceleration magnitude, and virtual potential temperature depression of the air parcel relative to the environment is θ_{v}’ = θ_{v parcel} – θ_{ve} .

Term (A) is an inertial effect. Term (B) includes the role of the added weight of cold air (with possible precipitation loading) in increasing the pressure [because θ_{v}’ is usually (but not always) negative in downbursts]. Both effects create a mesoscale high (**mesohigh**, H) pressure region centered on the downburst. Fig. 15.16 shows the solution to eq. (15.12) for a variety of different downburst velocities and virtual potential temperature deficits. Typical magnitudes are on the order of 0.1 to 0.6 kPa (or 1 to 6 mb) higher than the surrounding pressure.

As you move away vertically from the ground and horizontally from the downburst center, the pressure perturbation decreases, as suggested by the dashed line isobars in Figs. 15.11 and 15.17. The __vertical__ gradient of this pressure perturbation decelerates the downburst near the ground. The __horizontal__ gradient of the pressure perturbation accelerates the air horizontally away from the downburst, thus preserving air-mass continuity by balancing vertical inflow with horizontal **outflow** of air.

**Sample Application**

A downburst has velocity –22 m s^{–1} at 1 km altitude, before feeling the influence of the ground. Find the corresponding perturbation pressure at ground level for a downburst virtual potential temperature perturbation of (a) 0, and (b) –5°C.

**Find the Answer**

Given: w_{d }= –22 m s^{–1}, z = 1 km, θ_{v}’ = (a) 0, or (b) –5°C

Find: P’ _{max} = ? kPa

Assume standard atmosphere air density at sea level

ρ = 1.225 kg m^{–3 }

Assume θ_{ve} = 294 K. Thus |g|/θ_{ve} = 0.0333 m·s^{-2}·K^{-1}

Use eq. (15.12):

(a) P’ _{max} = (1.225 kg m^{–3})·[ (–22 m s^{–1})^{2}/_{2} – 0 ] = 296 kg·m^{–1}·s^{–2} = 296 Pa = **0.296 kPa**

(b) θ_{v}’ = –5°C = –5 K because it represents a temperature difference.

P’ _{max} = (1.225 kg m^{–3})· [ (–22 m s^{–1})^{2}/_{2} – (0.0333 m·s^{-2}·K^{-1})·(–5 K)·(1000 m)]

P’ _{max} = [ 296 + 204 ] kg·m^{–1}·s^{–2} = 500 Pa = **0.5 kPa**

**Check:** Units OK. Physics OK. Agrees with Fig. 15.16.

**Exposition:** For this case, the cold temperature of the downburst causes P’ to nearly double compared to pure inertial effects. Although P’ _{max} is small, P’ decreases to 0 over a short distance, causing large ∆P’/∆x & ∆P’/∆z. These large pressure gradients cause large accelerations of the air, including the rapid deceleration of the descending downburst air, and the rapid horizontal acceleration of the same air to create the outflow winds.

# 15.2.6. Outflow Winds & Gust Fronts

Driven by the pressure gradient from the meso-high,the near-surface **outflow** air tends to spread out in all directions radially from the downburst. It can be enhanced or reduced in some directions by background winds (Fig. 15.17).** Straight-line** outflow winds (i.e., non-tornadic; non-rotating) behind the gust front can be as fast as 35 m s^{–1}, and can blow down trees and destroy mobile homes. Such winds can make a howling sound called **aeolian tones**, as wake eddies form behind wires and twigs.

The outflow winds are accelerated by the perturbation-pressure gradient associated with the downburst mesohigh. Considering only the horizontal pressure-gradient force in Newton’s 2^{nd} Law (see the Forces & Winds Chapter), you can estimate the acceleration from

\(\ \begin{align} \frac{\Delta M}{\Delta t}=\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{P_{\max }^{\prime}}{r}\tag{15.13}\end{align}\)

where ∆M is change of outflow wind magnitude over time interval ∆t , ρ is air density, P’ _{max} is the pressure perturbation strength of the mesohigh, and r is the radius of the downburst (assuming it roughly equals the radius of the mesohigh).

The horizontal **divergence signature** of air from a downburst can be detected by Doppler weather radar by the couplet of “toward” and “away” winds, as was shown in the Satellites & Radar chapter. Figs. 15.18 and 15.19 show a downburst divergence signature and gust front.

Downburst intensity (Table 15-2) can be estimated from the maximum radial wind speed M_{max} observed by Doppler radar in the divergence couplet, and from the max change of wind speed ∆M_{max} along a radial line extending out from the radar at any height below 1 km above mean sea level (MSL).

**Gust front** is the name given to the leading edge of the cold **outflow** air (Figs. 15.11 & 15.17). These fronts act like shallow (100 to 1000 m thick) cold fronts, but with lifetimes of only several minutes to a few hours. Gust fronts can advance at speeds ranging from 5 to 15 m s^{–1}, and their length can be 5 to 100 km. The longer-lasting gust fronts are often associated with squall lines or supercells, where downbursts of cool air from a sequence of individual cells can continually reinforce the gust front.

Temperature drops of 1 to 3 °C have been recorded as a gust front passes a weather station. As this cold, dense air plows under warmer, less-dense humid air in the pre-storm environmental atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), the ABL air can be pushed up out of the way. If pushed above its LCL, clouds can form in this ABL air, perhaps even triggering new thunderstorms (a process called **propagation**). The new storms can develop their own gust fronts that can trigger additional thunderstorms, resulting in a storm sequence that can span large distances.

Greater gust front speeds are expected if faster downbursts pump colder air toward the ground. The continuity equation tells us that the vertical inflow rate of cold air flowing down toward the ground in the downburst must balance the horizontal outflow rate behind the gust front. If we also approximate the outflow thickness, then we can estimate the speed M_{gust} of advance of the gust front relative to the ambient environmental air as

\(\ \begin{align} M_{g u s t}=\left[\frac{0.2 \cdot r^{2} \cdot\left|w_{d} \cdot g \cdot \Delta T_{v}\right|}{R \cdot T_{v e}}\right]^{1 / 3}\tag{15.14}\end{align}\)

where r is average downburst radius, R is average distance of the gust front from the downburst center, w_{d} is downburst speed, ∆T_{v} is virtual temperature difference between the cold-outflow and environmental air, and T_{ve} (K) is the environmental virtual temperature.

**Sample Application**

For a mesohigh of max pressure 0.5 kPa and radius 5 km, how fast will the outflow winds become during 1 minute of acceleration?

**Find the Answer**

Given: P’ _{max} = 0.5 kPa, r = 5 km, ∆t = 60 s

Find: ∆M = ? m s^{–1}

Solve eq. (15.13) for M. Assume ρ = 1.225 kg m^{–3}.

\(\Delta M=\frac{(60 \mathrm{s})}{\left(1.225 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right)} \cdot \frac{(0.5 \mathrm{kPa})}{(5 \mathrm{km})}=\underline{\mathbf{4 . 9} \mathrm{m} \mathrm{s}^{-1}}\)

**Check:** Physics OK. Units OK. Magnitude OK.

**Exposition:** In real downbursts, the pressure gradient varies rapidly with time and space. So this answer should be treated as only an order-of-magnitude estimate.

Table 15-2. Doppler-radar estimates of thunderstorm-cell downburst intensity based on either the maximum outflow wind speed or the maximum wind difference along a radar radial. |
||

Intensity |
Max radial-wind speed (m s^{–1}) |
Max wind difference along a radial (m s^{–1}) |

Moderate | 18 | 25 |

Severe | 25 | 40 |

In the expression above, the following approximation was used for gust-front thickness h_{gust}:

\(\ \begin{align} h_{g u s t} \approx 0.85 \cdot\left[\frac{T_{v e}}{\left|g \cdot \Delta T_{v}\right|}\left(\frac{w_{d} \cdot r^{2}}{R}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 3}\tag{15.15}\end{align}\)

As the gust front spreads further from the downburst, it moves more slowly and becomes shallower. Also, colder outflow air moves faster in a shallower outflow than does less-cold outflow air.

In dry environments, the fast winds behind the gust front can lift soil particles from the ground (a process called **saltation**). While the heavier sand particles fall quickly back to the ground, the finer dust particles can become **suspended** __within__ the air. The resulting dust-filled outflow air is called a **haboob** (Fig. 15.20), **sand storm** or **dust storm**. The airborne dust is an excellent tracer to make the gust front visible, which appears as a turbulent advancing wall of brown or ocher color.

In moister environments over vegetated or rainwetted surfaces, instead of a haboob you might see **arc cloud** (**arcus**) or **shelf cloud** __over__ (not within) an advancing gust front. The arc cloud forms when the warm humid environmental ABL air is pushed upward by the undercutting cold outflow air. Sometimes the top and back of the arc cloud are connected or almost connected to the thunderstorm, in which case the cloud looks like a shelf attached to the thunderstorm, and is called a **shelf cloud**.

When the arc cloud moves overhead, you will notice sudden changes. Initially, you might observe the warm, humid, fragrant boundary-layer air that was blowing toward the storm. After gust-front passage, you might notice colder, gusty, sharp-smelling (from ozone produced by lightning discharges) downburst air.

**Sample Application**

A thunderstorm creates a downburst of speed of 4 m s^{–1} within an area of average radius 0.6 km. The gust front is 3°C colder than the environment air of 300 K, and is an average of 2 km away from the center of the downburst. Find the gust-front advancement speed and depth.

**Find the Answer**

Given: ∆T_{v} = –3 K, T_{ve} = 300 K, w_{d} = –4 m s^{–1}, r = 0.6 km, R = 2 km,

Find: M_{gust} = ? m s^{–1}, h_{gust} = ? m

Employ eq. (15.14): \(M_{g u s t}=

\left[\frac{0.2 \cdot(600 \mathrm{m})^{2} \cdot(-4 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}) \cdot\left(-9.8 \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{s}^{-2}\right) \cdot(-3 \mathrm{K})}{(2000 \mathrm{m}) \cdot(300 \mathrm{K})}\right]^{1/3}

=\underline{\mathbf{2.42 \mathrm{m} \mathrm{s}^{-1}}}

\)

Employ eq. (15.15):

\( h_{g u s t}=

0.85\left[\left(\frac{(-4 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}) \cdot(600 \mathrm{m})^{2}}{(2000 \mathrm{m})}\right)^{2} \frac{(300 \mathrm{K})}{\left(-9.8 \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{s}^{-2}\right) \cdot(-3 \mathrm{K})}\right]^{1 / 3} =\underline{\mathbf{174m}}\)

**Check:** Units OK. Physics OK.

**Exposition:** Real gust fronts are more complicated than described by these simple equations, because the outflow air can turbulently mix with the environmental ABL air. The resulting mixture is usually warmer, thus slowing the speed of advance of the gust front.